George Osborne Says UK Datacentre Opposition Threatens AI Sovereignty
The ex-chancellor, now OpenAI's head of AI for countries, argues Britain risks falling behind if planning resistance to datacentres continues.
George Osborne, the former British chancellor who now serves as OpenAI's head of AI for countries, has warned that local opposition to datacentres is hampering the United Kingdom's ability to compete in the global artificial intelligence race. His remarks came in direct response to protests that have emerged across Britain against the large-scale facilities, which critics cite for their heavy consumption of water and energy.
Osborne's current role at OpenAI — the company behind ChatGPT — puts him at the intersection of government relations and infrastructure development. He is responsible for engaging with governments worldwide and plays a direct part in facilitating the construction of datacentres and related AI infrastructure, making his public defense of such projects both strategic and self-interested by his own implicit acknowledgment.
Read more Reader Proposal: Link Billionaire Tax Breaks to Living Wages →
The former Conservative chancellor framed the issue in terms of national interest, arguing that the UK must build out this infrastructure to maintain what he described as "sovereignty" over AI technology. The argument mirrors a broader debate playing out across Western nations, where governments are grappling with how to balance community concerns about large industrial facilities against the perceived strategic necessity of anchoring AI capacity domestically.
Opposition to datacentres in the UK has grown alongside increasing public awareness of the resources these facilities require. Critics — sometimes labeled "nimbys" by proponents — have raised concerns about strain on local power grids, water supplies, and land use. Osborne's framing positions that resistance as a national liability rather than a legitimate planning concern, a stance that is likely to intensify an already contentious policy debate.
Continue reading at Business | The Guardian.